Wednesday's Supreme Court decision is not about an abortion procedure. It's about women's health. It's about privacy. And it's about the
conservative judicial activist movement.
The Supreme Court, thanks to its new conservative activists John Roberts and
Sam Alito -- who snowed far
too many people into thinking they were moderates who respected the right to
privacy and court precedents -- overruled
35 years of precedent, declaring abortion restrictions do not have to include
exceptions to protect the health of the woman.
Meaning that there no longer is privacy from government intervention in the
woman-doctor relationship.
The conservative activists do not yet fully control the Court. Justice
Anthony Kennedy remains a swing vote, even if he swung in the wrong direction
today.
But this ruling is another reminder of what the conservative
activists want.
They do not want representative government that protects everyone's freedom
to make their own personal moral decision.
They want elitist government that imposes their moral vision on
everyone else.
A lot of folks went soft during the Roberts and Alito nomination. There will
really be no excuse to roll over for the next conservative activist nominee.
|
I don't know if you have heard it described or not, but in a nutshell this is what happens. The baby's head is pulled out of the mother's womb just 3 inches from life. A pair of scissors is then inserted into the baby's skull, the brains sucked out, and then the remains of a baby who could have been perfectly viable outside the womb is thrown away. I'm sorry, but that has nothing to do with a women's right to choose, women's health, or any of that other garbage liberals use to justify the slaughter of millions of innocent babys over the years.
Permanent Link