

| Labyrinth of the Mind |
Natures LawThis debate that has been going on at a Lit. Form I belong to has got me thinking. The debate itself involved the issue regaurding the surperior/inferority or equality between man and animals, and of course being what my feelings are toward human kind and my personal beleif systems I do not beleive in the superiority of man over animals, and sometimes or perhaps most the time I rather find man to prove himself inferrior. But at any rate the majority of the people upon the site seem to be Christains, and we all know where Christians stand on the issue, they think that nature is something to repressed and comanded over, and that animals are souless beings, and man is somehow better then all other living things. And so I have been a lone voice in the debate but when it comes to the topic of animals I am not an easy one to argue with becasue that is one subject in which I am quite well versed and can often provide ample proof to back up my arguments and opinions, and about the only thing they have going for them is "well the bible says this" or the "bible says that" which really is not a valid arugment considering I view the Bible as a work of mythology.
But I am digressing from the particular topic which I wanted to address here. I think that people have the bad habbit of trying to apply human understanding, human concepts of "good and evil" and human laws and rules to animals. And even as there very actions seem to contradict thier cliam to superiorty, considering they often tend to treat animals, when it suits them, as if animals do have the same ablity to judge right from wrong as human's do which would be defult make them equal I would think.
And though I do not belive in the inferiorty of animals, I do think they live by a different set of rules then humans do, and they do have a different preception, and it is by thier own laws so to speak, in which they should be judged to be completely fair, not by human rules, if they will not be treated as equal to human in any other way.
What I mean, is for example, when an animal attacks a human being, that animal is treated the way a person is treated whom does violence willingly and knowingly agianst another human being, but needless to say a few steps in the justice process for the animal are left out. That is, when an animal attacks, it is then hunted down and destroyed, and considred to be a danger to society, or a bad animal, much like a human criminal.
But animals do not attack people becasue it is thier will or intent to be malecious for the sake of being maleicious. Or becasue they are just hanging around board, and think, hey lets go attack someone for the pure fun and enjoyment of it. They do not do it becasue they are an evil or bad animal.
When an animal attacks a person, it is becasue they are defending thier home, and genunely beleive thier life is in danger, by this standard and by thier own nature and preceiption of the situtaion, the animal is in fact acting rightly and correctly, and thus it should not be punnished for it has in fact not done any true wrong.
I personally do not think that animals should be punnished for attacking human beings, for one thing I would say 99.9% of the time the human has done something to put themselves in that situation, and if people are going to continue to intrude upon the homes of animals then they should be given the chance to defend thier homes, and if a person does get attacked by an animal, than it should simply be considred a natural cause, or as an accepted risk.
But human beings are just too narcissistic to ever accept this ideology. They have too great a need to feel as if they are somehow special.
And mind you I am not saying that the person should not immediately defend themselves during the time of the attack, it is a part of nature for one to fight for ones own surival. But I do not think the authorities should be involved, and after the attack is done and over, then it should just be left at that, the animal should not later be tracked down and destroyed. 7:23 PM - 1/4/2008 - post comment
|
Quote of the Week: Faith whic does not doubt is dead faith ~ Migeul de Uamuno
Home User Profile Archives Friends My Wall ![]() ShadowEyes The Aristos Poem Hunter Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster StopWhaling NRDC BioGems IFAW Social Values Marketplace Blogthings Shadow Poetry Seafood Choices Alliance Look At Me Stop The Seal Hunt Holla Back My Deviant Art My Cafe Press Store Bold, Beautiful, and Big Internet Movie Database Responsible Traveling Ethical Traveling Green Weddings Eco-Friendly Sking and Snowboarding Keep Winter Cool Green Resorts Beyond the Mystery The Spiders Den The Poetry Forum The Literature Forum Frederick W. Cook Good Reads Deconstruction of Kamikaze Kurt The Mystics Dream Timeless Visions
Recent Entries - The Unforgiveable - Unexpected Surprises - The Morning After - All in a rush - Autumn's Calling
Catagory - Articles - Books - Arcane - Movies - Music - Philosophy - Poetry - Writing - Thoughts - Rants - The Silvernary - Word of the day - Quote of the Week - In Praise Of - Art - Confessional - Garden and Animal Journal - Roots - Raw - Humur - Photography
Friends - JournalHome - troutdude - DAWNIE - kaymbl0403 - Heather - silvermelusine - Fightingfemale - LandsdownLad - dutchboy - pykimconant - inamorata - Realove - sweetlydisturbed - imagination999 - SilverWynd - lobond - DarthTsynn - YankeeInnkeeper - StarrSilverMoon - shokat99 - sweet2pinkash - LadySilverMoon - glorydreamer386 - 5489 - TheSeraphim - enelda - Zachtin - visitor - thecolumn
![]() Visit www.hostdrjack.com
![]() www.hostdrjack.com
![]() Visit www.hostdrjack.com
![]() Visit www.hostdrjack.com
![]()
![]() Visit www.hostdrjack.com
|


