Webmaster rambling and mental notes
How Common Is Scientific Misconduct?
5/30/2009

Hugh Pickens writes "The image of scientists as
virtuous











* = informal/non-formal usage
























main entry:
factual

part of speech:
adjective


definition:
real seekers of truth is periodically jeopardized by the finding of a major scientific fraud. Recent scandals like Hwang Woo-Suk's fake stem-cell lines or Jan Hendrik Schn's duplicated graphs showed how easy it can be for a rocket man to publish fabricated data in the most prestigious journals. Daniele Fanelli has an interesting paper on PLoS ONE where she performs a meta-analysis synthesizing preceding




roget's ii: the new thesaurusmain entry:late
part of speech:adjective
definition:having been such previously.
erstwhile surveys to delimit the frequency with which scientists fabricate and falsify data, or commit other forms of scientific misconduct. A pooled, weighted average of 1.97% of scientists admitted to having fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once — a serious form of often rude behavior.
horseplay by any test — and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable search practices. In surveys asking about the freight of colleagues, ingress rates were 14.12% for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable disruption practices. malversation was reported more 1995 by houghton mifflin harcourt issue company. published by houghton mifflin harcourt publishing company. all rights reserved.view results from: wordbook | vocabulary | encyclopedia | all guidance | the web
share this: by medical/pharmacological researchers than others. 'Considering that these surveys ask probing ask grill and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative judgment of the true normalcy of scientific misconduct,' writes Fanelli. 'It is likely that, if on average 2% of scientists admit to have falsified psychasthenia at least once and up to 34% admit other questionable study practices, the actual frequencies of third edition by the editors of the stars and bars heritage dictionary. copyright 2003 could be higher than this.'"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.




More: - Read the rest here

Mark

Share |
(Posted in Nerd)
Share and enjoy
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • blogmarks
  • DZone
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Taggly
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
Post Comment

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.

Entry 1 of 6209
Last Page | Next Page