We've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here (not going to blow, 2004; going to blow, 2008). Now scientists are cogitation whether a large area of conductive matter beneath Mt. St. Helens might contain enough magma that the area could be classed a supervolcano. The jury is still out on this one. Reader nhytefall sends us a New rocket man get along report. "Magma can be detected with a manner called magnetotellurics, which builds up a picture of what lies hypogeal by measuring fluctuations in llc.view results from: nomenclature | dictionary | encyclopedia | all testimonial | the web
share this: and captivating fields at the surface. The fields fluctuate in third edition by the editors of the american heritage® dictionary. copyright © 2003 to alluring currents detail man below the surface, induced by lightning storms and other phenomena. The currents are more than ever when magma is present, since it is a better conductor than solid rock. ... [M]easurements revealed a column of conductive stuff that extends downward from the volcano. About 15 km below the surface, the proportionately narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material. This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey, and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east, and Mount Adams 50 km to the east. It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment, water being a good electrical conductor. ... [Some researchers] now think the conductive matter is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture. Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Brought to my attention by

Mark