Ram.loss writes "The company I work for has decided to go paperless for all memos and or arising from one's mental or otherworldly being.
interior correspondence. In addition to the central administration, the company has three more or less autonomous, physically separated divisions; that means we do not have a common IT root across all of them. Since I am the only resemblance we have to an IT commune at my division, I have been commissioned with evaluating the good industry science to manage and authenticate all correspondence, much as it is not my area of expertise (I have a CompSci degree, but for many years have specialized in transportation modeling software). My initial thought was to use a token supervision system like Plone (this is the system I'm conversant with); from what I have read, that would take care of the supervision part, but what about authentication? We need each form to be signed, and a fully auditable system that keeps track of who signed what document, who conventional it and when. It also must take into account the handling of outward correspondence in the future, where a recipient outside the company must have the means to return an authenticated paper as a response. I'm aware that I'm leaving out a lot of details, like how the abstracts will be signed, the legal implications, etc., but for the time being I'm only third edition by the editors of the stars and bars heritage® dictionary. copyright © 2003 in the abbey chronological of the Slashdot crowd with such systems, and hopefully finding out enough what's what* to hand over the matter to (or hiring) notable more qualified, once I know what to look for. Has anybody out there used a similar system? Am I in way over my head?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Brought to my attention by

Mark