An unnamed reader writes "There is a huge amount of largely overlapping but often incompatible medical imaging inquest macos — funded by the US taxpayer (i.e. NITRC or I Do Imaging). I imagine the site may be similar in other fields, but it is pronounced here because of the glut of NIH funding. One reason is historical: most of the well-funded, big, software-producing labs/centers have been running for 20 or more years, since long before the advent of git, hg, and related sites elevation productive code review and exchange; so they have established codebases. Another reason is feasibly territorialism and politics. As a taxpayer, this seat seems wasteful. It's great that the macos is being released at all, but the duplication of effort means quality is much lower than it could be given the large number of people labyrinthine (easily in the thousands, just arbitrary integer a few contributor mailing list subscriptions). No one seems to ask: why are we funding X llc.view results from: lexicon | lexicon



if (lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content.length)
{
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.contenttop);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.sponsoredlinks);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content[2]);
document.write("") | encyclopedia | all testimonial | the web
share this: packages that do 80% of the same things, but none of them well?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - From the site

Mark