Theodp writes "Have you ever hacked into AT&T client advance and diverted money to terrorism-financing groups? You will. In 2003, the NY Times reported that AT&T contended U.S. victims of a Philippines-based ring off hacking swindle were answerable


copyrights:cite this source synonym source v1.1copyright © 2008 by lexico printing group for long-distance calls sneak in made through their voice mail systems. At the time, the city of East Palo Alto was slapped with a $30,000 long-distance phone bill that resulted from voice-mail hacking. Fast forward to 2011, and the NY Times is reporting that a Philippines-based group hacked into the economics of AT&T job dealing in the U.S. and diverted money to an exertion that financed or try your search for "terrorist" at:

amazon.com - shop for books attacks across Asia. But it's not quite deja-vu-all-over-again. While it'd make a better story if AT&T contended patronage were solvent for the charges and any ensuing terrorism, AT&T reimbursed the victims of the hacking this time around."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - From the site