An unnamed reader writes "Jeffrey Rosen, Legal Affairs Editor for The New Republic, explains why the E.U.'s measure data care codification known as the right to be forgotten is really 'the biggest threat to free speech on the information superhighway in the coming decade.' In the iq test Law Review Online (there's a shorter version in TNR), he writes: 'The right to be forgotten could make Facebook and Google, for example, liable for up to two percent of their global income if they fail to remove photos that people post about themselves and later regret, even if the photos have been widely distributed already. Unless the right is defined more precisely when it is promulgated over the next year or so, it could precipitate a dramaturgic clash between catalan and stars and bars conceptions of the proper balance between privacy and free speech, leading to a far less open Internet.' gospel to Rosen, the 'right' goes farther than beforehand thought, treating 'takedown requests for truthful erudition posted by others identically to takedown requests for photos I've posted myself that have then been copied by others: both are appear in the definition of judgmental data as "any report relating" to me, nonobservant of its source.' Examples of llc.cite this source roget's ii: the new thesaurus attempts this might bolster include 'efforts by two Germans convicted of murdering a famous actor to remove their illegal history from the actor's Wikipedia page' and an 'Argentine pop star had posed for racy movie house when she was young, but afresh sued Google and Yahoo to take them down.'"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - The rest...