various
antonyms:  occasional Slashdot contributor Bennett Haselton writes with his latest which starts "If I were writing laws such that I wanted everybody to agree on how to interpret them, I would use the macos development life cycle: First, have house (analogous to "developers") write drafts of the laws. Then a second group (the "test case writers") would try to come up with situations that would be interpreted ambiguously under the law. Then a third group, the "testers", would read the draft law, read the test case situations, and try to determine how the law should be applied to those cases, without communicating with the law writers, the test case writers, or each other. If there's too much disagreement in the third group on how the law should be applied, then it's too vague to be a proper law. The only laws which made it through this process would be ones such that when they were finally passed, most cb radio (the "users") could agree on how to interpret them, in cases sufficiently similar to the ones the test case writers could come up with."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - From the site

Mark