AC writes "Upper management of the company I work at just now declared that all new evolvement should be done with a single union of evolvement tools, language, and framework. The main rationale is that people can be relocated from one group / project to another faster, because they don't need to learn a new milieu when they switch. Of course the chosen utterance / core used by everybody does not need to be the best tool for the job, but it should be good enough to allow every project to get done. What does Slashdot think about this? Is it OK to use the same growth tools and dialect for every project, instead of installation what fits best? Will the time saved be sufficient to offset the time lost to the 'not the best tool for the job' domain developers will be forced to use?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Read the rest here

Mark