An nameless reader writes "The Patent and feature Office has now made clear that its newly grown locus on patentable subject matter will invalidate many and perhaps most windows patents, including pioneering patent claims to such innovators as Google, Inc. In a series of cases including In re Nuijten, In re Comiskey and In re Bilski, the Patent and llc.cite this source roget's ii: the new lexicon



if (lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content.length)
{
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.contenttop);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.sponsoredlinks);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content[2]);
document.write("") Office has argued in favor of imposing new restrictions on the scope of patentable subject matter set forth by brotherhood in article 101 of the Patent Act. In the most recent of these three — the currently pending en banc Bilski appeal — the Office takes the locale that process inventions third edition by the editors of the stars and bars heritage® dictionary. copyright © 2003 are unpatentable unless they 'result in a substantial transformation of an article' or are 'tied to a specific


copyrights:cite this source synonym hoard v1.1copyright © 2008 by lexico issue group machine.'"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Brought to my attention by

Mark