Snydeq writes "Deep End's Paul Venezia criticizes the lack of illegitimate charges for common laxity in data breaches in the wake of last week's Best Western breach, which exposed the intimate data of 8 million customers. 'The responsibilities attached to retaining penetrating corporeal identity report should include illegitimate charges against the company liability for a leak, in addition to the party that receives the information,' Venezia writes. 'Until the penalties for giving away responsive info* in this manner include heavy fines and likely even jail time for those obligation for securing that information, we'll see this problem occur again and again.' As data guard lawyer Thomas J. Smedinghoff writes, data access systems & monitoring. call today.www.tutela.us
roget's ii: the new thesaurusmain entryefense
part of speech:noun
definition:the act or a means of defending.
guard law is already shifting the blame for data breaches onto IT, thanks to an gush bare bones* of complex regulations that could result in grave legal result should your format suffer a breach. To date, however, IT's duty to provide lien and its duty to impart data breaches does not include illicit prosecution. Yet, with much of the data shield scheme being shaped by 'IT negligence' court cases over 'reasonable' security, that could very well be put to the test some day in court." It's a slippery slope to be sure, but where should the buck stop?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Brought to my attention by

Mark