Ruphus13 writes "A lot of developers for open source systems program have full-time day jobs too. As economist Milton Friedman said, 'The line of vocation is business.' So, does it make sense for companies to rally their developers to contribute to the open source community? OStatic discusses a blog post by Alfresco exec Matt Asay, who makes the case for why they should. '"Companies like IBM, Intel, SGI, MIPS, Freescale, HP, etc. are all working to ensure that Linux runs well on their hardware. That, in turn, makes their offerings more cute to Linux users, resulting in increased sales." While I don't think we'll ever see companies everywhere subsidizing worker



human resource infonytimes.com has human resources information for your small businesswww.nytimes.comsponsored linkshr news & infoyour source for the latest hr strategies evolvement of open source tools, many tech and non-tech companies alike could benefit from subsidizing open source unfolding from employees with talent. If more companies woke up to this idea, we'd see more purpose-driven, mission-critical open source os shared by firms in the same industries. That, ultimately, would benefit the companies in case the subsidies.' Should your hirer



local employersfind & compare employers in atlantawww.kudzu.comsponsored link
synonym collection v1.1main entry:employer
part of speech:noun
boss pay you for time spent on open source development?" snydeq points out an Infoworld story suggesting that there's individual to learn from the way French companies are billing open-source development.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - The rest...

Mark