Piranhaa writes "At the major llc.cite this source roget's ii: the new thesaurus I work for, there is currently a single person who decides what system macos to approve and disapprove within the organization. I've noticed that requests from users for open source Windows programs get denied, nearly instantaneously, on a regular basis. either from Gimp, to Firefox, even to Vim don't make the cut due to the simple fact that they are open source. Closed source programs from unknown vendors have a much better chance at community antenna television than Firefox does. The whole mentality here is that anybody can change the source of a project, submit it, and you never know what kind of compiled binary you're going to get. I'm a firm believer in open source code, but I also know closed source has it's place. So what would be the best way for me to argue, with all the facts, to allow these people to come to their own conclusion that open source is quite good? Would presenting examples of other big companies moving to open source work, and if so what are some good examples? Or can you suggest any other good approaches?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Brought to my attention by

Mark