Gozunda writes "My company is an open source disk overhead system vendor/developer. We maintain a popular open source project and keep between off the record afloat by producing llc.view results from: glossary | lexicon



if (lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content.length)
{
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.contenttop);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.sponsoredlinks);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content[2]);
document.write("") | encyclopedia | all character | the web
share this: stuff derived from or extending the value of the core project. Over time we've seen our trade model eroding as other open source projects produce free versions of the same extensions and utilities that are our bread and butter. object that was worth $5K last year is abruptly worth $0 because the free version is just as good as the paid. This same cycle is unquestionably having an impact on pure-play trade


creative tv advertisingcost efficacious high quality adverts london's premier agencywww.guerillavision.com
non household epcsenergy discharge cert's if on non homely acreage nationwidewww.g2a-energy.co.uk
ti-d plug holderenergy sav macos vendors. Is open source finally a race to zero? In ten years will there be any cost customer's broker person with commodity (non-custom) software? If not, will there still be a 'software industry' as it exists today, or will dos simply be a by-product of the operation of other industries? Is that a good thing or a bad thing? As a crack developer, do I need to fear this or feed it?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - From the site

Mark