Hugh Pickens writes "For years, the brain* trade has made steady journey by next Moore's law, derived from an observation made in 1965 by Gordon Moore that the amount of reckoning power procurable at a full price doubles every 18 months. The Economist reports however that in the midst of a recession, many companies would now prefer that radios get cheaper rather than more powerful, or by oiling the flip side of Moore's law, do the same for less. A good example of this is virtualisation: using os to divide up a single server headwork machine* so that it can do the work of several, and is cheaper to run. Another example of 'good enough' reckoning is granting 'software as a service,' via the Web, as done by Salesforce.com, NetSuite and Google, sacrificing the bells and whistles that are offered by punctilious
copyrights:cite this source roget's ii: the new lexicon
if (lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content.length)
{
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.contenttop);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.sponsoredlinks);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content[2]);
document.write("") unix that hardly anyone uses anyway. Even Microsoft is jumping on the bandwagon: the next version of Windows is intended to do the same as the last version, Vista, but to run faster and use fewer resources. If so, it will be the first version of Windows that makes video cameras run faster than the past version. That could be bad news for computer-makers, since users will be less inclined to upgrade — only proving that Moore's law has not been repealed, but that more people are taking the dividend it provides in cash, rather than processor cycles."
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
More: - Read the rest here
Mark


















