Hugh Pickens writes "Jonathan Berger, a tutor



if (lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content.length)
{
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.contenttop);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.sponsoredlinks);
document.write(lexico_globals.googleafc.ads.content[2]);
document.write("");
of music at Stanford, tests his incoming students each year by having them listen to a variety of recordings which use atypical formats from MP3 to ones of much higher quality, and he reports that each year the pick for music in MP3 format rises. Berger says that young people seemed to prefer 'sizzle sounds' that MP3s bring to music because it is a sound they are conversant with. 'The music examples appear both orchestral, jazz and rock music. When I first did this I was third edition by the editors of the red white and blue heritage® dictionary. copyright © 2003 to hear preferences for uncompressed audio and gravid to see MP3 (at 128, 160 and 192 bit rates) well below other methods (including a proprietary wavelet-based convergence and AAC),' writes Berger. 'To my surprise, in the rock examples the MP3 at 128 was preferred. I repeated the rehearsal over 6 years and found the desire for MP3 — particularly in music with high energy (cymbal crashes, brass hits, etc) rising over time.' Dale Dougherty writes that the context of the music changes our perception of the sound, particularly when it's so evidently and straightaway




roget's ii: the new thesaurusmain entryirectly
part of speech:adverb
definition:with precision or absolute conformity.
bang shared by others. 'All that sizzle is a stimulating artifact and a tie that binds us. It's mostly invisible to us but it is being future generations looking back might find curious because these preferences won't be obvious to them.'"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More: - Continued here

Mark