| Bill in Beijing That Which Passes Passes Like Clouds |
CONCERNING BEING ANDTHE EXQUISITE NECESSITY OF SUFFERING CONCERNING BEING AND THE EXQUISITE NECESSITY OF SUFFERING
I When a person has lived most of his life not accepting the possibility that God exists in any form and then they struggle with the desire to believe that He does in some way his life becomes a world of new conflicts and challenges in regards explanations and reasons. A new category of questions emerges and he is forced, against his will, to try and define a thing he once argued was indefinable. There is no choice. Evil must be attempted to be explained now with a God in the background of it all. Does life continue or cease after death? How can he be sure of anything he thinks and has an opinion on regarding what is indefinable? II If you are driven to believe in God then you are consequently driven to give to God a character, a nature. You have are forced into assigning God attributes that seem dubious. How can I ever be sure that the attributes I assign to God are not simply the attributes I want God to have? If I say God is forgiving and merciful on what basis do I rest that argument. Not to say there are not brilliant arguments to give to support any statement we can make about God, but how can I ever be 100% certain that the conclusion I have reached is not tainted, poisoned by own limited intellect, my own corruptions and desires. III If I say God is a forgiving and merciful God, maybe all I am saying is that I want a God that will be forgiving and merciful with me. The whole situation becomes problematic for me. If God is merciful then will He not simply bestow mercy on me, or do I have to do something... jump though some burning hoop of fire... to receive that mercy? How can I, or anyone, be 100% certain that they have not erred and jumped through the wrong hoop? Some people have an absolute degree of certainty about their position, that the hoops they are leaping through are the correct ones. But if two people are diametrically opposed in their positions how can they both be right even if they are both 100% certain that they are correct? How can you verify the unknowable? Some people will argue that the unknowable can be known. If not with absolute accuracy they will say that they have concluded that 2+2=5, which is closer to the Truth than saying 2+2=8. But when speaking of God no one can truly make the claim that 2+2=4. You would have to be God Himself to make such a claim. IV I want a God who is merciful and who will forgive me, or I want a system at least wherein there is some concept of redemption. A system where my life can be changed and I can become a new thing. But I ask with exhaustion, how can I know that the system is truly this thing, and that it is not simply this thing because I want it to be? Simply because I want or need God to exist does not bring a nonexistent God suddenly into being. So I am pinned on the horns of a dilemma. I can choose to simply believe in a God or a system of redemption for no other reason than I am driven to believe out of human despair and hope that in believing I find some consolation and comfort. Or I can choose to not believe and free myself of all the doubts belief generates (though not believing does not mean not doubting, else why would I have chosen to believe?) Yet, in not believing I am forced to accept the Universe as a cold and brute fact, and not thing possibly possessed of a higher and more sublime purpose. V And yet, regardless of the choice we make life seems to remain the same. Cold and ruthless. Believing in God does not alter the fact that life for humans is not much different on some levels than life for wild animals. There are differences and one is that the human animal has no choice but to be aware of all the conflicts and dangers and despair. There is in the human animal anxiety over the future and regret over the past that seems to be lacking in the brute animal. This maybe is one reason I am driven to believe in God. I cannot face life alone. I am coward. And I get tired of accepting all the responsibility for all my mistakes and aberrance. Now I can blame fate. I can blame destiny. I can blame karma. I can blame God. And I have decided to believe in a merciful God, so He will forgive me for blaming Him in the end.
2:09 PM - 12/8/2005 - post comment
Share and enjoy
|
Description The Chrocicles of the Wire Monkey/Sponsored by Miasma Inc. Home User Profile Archives Friends My Wall Jobe Smith's Blog Paul's Thailand Blog My Photo Log A Canadian Groovin' in Taiwan Ivy's Blog My Photo Log II Greatest Website in China Japanese Tabloid News Eightball Magazine Exploding Cigar Singapore Philosopher Simon Fripp Recent Entries - Reflections on desperate situations and lost causes - I just want all God's creatures to love life the way I do - If You really Knew Me You Would Not Like Me yadda yadda - Qin Nian Kuai Le - Quick Updates on Life in General... a little on the edgy side Friends |