S(t)ein Language: "Picasso"

Got it. S(t)ein Language. Never will. Completely. S(t)ein Language.Throw it in, like, S(t)ein Language. Do you see it? S(t)ein Language. S(t)ein Language. One more time. No, here: S(t)ein language. Following S(t)ein Language. Completely following Stein language. Stein dict.

To be a genius. Not needed. Purpose. Cliché. Identity. Why identity? That’s the question. Word make identity. Caught in identity. Stuck in something. Not identity. Stuck something. S(t)ein language. Don’t know it. Just heard of it. S(t)ein Language. S(t)ein Language. Come on Stein. Genius. Don’t know it.

Faults. Yes. Certainly faults. Certainly following faults of one who was certainly working on faults. One. And Who. One and Who make Two. In the same. That’s identity. One and Who. Two. Stein Language. Following. Working. Completely. Who says faults? You. One and Who and You make Three. Three in One. Good deal. Death deal. Death in real time. Death in wake. S(t)ein language. Death not whom think. Whom not in Three. Whom is something not You. Or One. Or Who. No reason. Just not whom.

One and Who and You don’t know why Stein. One and Who and You are following. One and Who and You didn’t use I. Picasso has an I. Stein has an I. Picasso and Stein and One and Who and You, not whom. But One and Who and You wrote without Picasso and Stein, did Stein write with out Picasso and Stein? That’s the second question.

4:54 PM - 7/20/2006 - post comment