Random Blog
Join JournalHome.com.
Create your own free blog today.
Create Your Blog
Flag this entry/bog.
It will be manually reviewed.
Report This!

Soul Craft

Exploring the I in 'I am'

Would You Still Love Me if there was No God? (8/16/2005)

Posted in Family

A few weeks back my seven year old son asked me, "Would you still love me if there was no God?" The problem with questions like this is that you have absolutely no time to think about them.  They hit you out of the blue, and the answer is important.

 

The answer I gave was something very close to this, "I can’t really answer that because there is a God so I don’t know what it would mean if there wasn’t one.  Since God created everything there wouldn’t be a "˜me’ or a "˜you’ or anything, so I wouldn’t be here to love you.  Also, God is the source of all love, so without God I wouldn’t be able to love anything."

 

That’s as close as I can remember to what I said, and frankly I don’t think I did a very good job answering him.  At the same time, I don’t have a clue what the right answer would have been.

 

Although I would be very interested to know what other people think the right answer is, I don’t want to make that the focus of this article.  Instead, I’d like to address a reprimand I have received about this answer.  On hearing my answer, one of my friends said, "It’s wrong to "˜push’ your religious beliefs on your children.  They need to be given the chance to find out what is true for themselves."  I’ve heard this general sentiment from Atheists, Christians, Bahá'ís and Buddhists.  It’s common but it’s wrong.

 

Is it wrong to tell your children not to hit, or that they should treat people with respect, or that it’s important to learn math because they will need it in the future?  Most people view this as not only acceptable, but a duty.  How is this any different than teaching your children about God or then nature of their Soul or any other beliefs?

 

If you believe something and it has an effect on how you live your life, whatever that belief is, it seems to me you are obliged to share those ideas and beliefs with your children.  This is not brainwashing, it is taking an active interest in the spiritual growth of your children.  They will hear you; they will observe how you act; they will see how your beliefs are reflected in the way you live; and in the end they will make choices about how they will act and what they will believe. 

 

Many people seem to have the idea that when you teach your children about your beliefs that they become automatons parroting you and acting out what they are told to be true.  It also seems to me that these people must never have raised any children!  Children are not blank tablets on which we write.  They are unique, and they are surprisingly independent. 

 

Unless you are doing something very harsh and very unusual, your children will have plenty of opportunities to determine for themselves what is true and what is not.  You should encourage this exploration, but you don’t need to pretend that you have no beliefs or that you don’t think your beliefs deserve more attention than those of others.  That would be, quite frankly, untrue.

 

The last reason I reject this view is that it represents a shirking of a very important duty.  Children are naturally curious and will ask about such things as what happens when we die, why they shouldn’t hit people, what God is, etc?  The idea of "not pushing your beliefs" appears to be an easy "˜out’ allowing you to let your beliefs go unexamined.  If you accept your moral responsibility to raise your children with values then you should also accept your own responsibility to make sure for yourself that your moral values are correct.  These questions then serve as a very healthy reminder that you should be living by the code you espouse.

 

No doubt it is possible to push your beliefs.  If you are locking your children away from society and offering only one view of the world then you have gone too far.  Taking any extreme measure to ensure their acceptance is clearly a mistake, but just because you can go too far doesn’t mean you should pretend to be a nihilist for fear of contaminating young minds.

 

Belief and action are intertwined.  If your actions are not in accordance with your beliefs one or both need examined.  If we come to accept that being and doing are two sides of the same coin then it is natural and right that we should teach our children through both our actions and our words.

 

Share |
:: Send to a Friend!

8/29/2005 - Untitled Comment

Posted by Anon
I have never raised any children nor do I ever plan to, so I can only say this based on my own interpretation of how it is to be a kid. I grew up in a family where religious beliefs were not discussed so much. Both of my parents are from different religious backgrounds and neither of them are very religious. I started asking my dad about God and the meaning of life when I was about 7. My dad, being a scientist, would give me theoretical explanations, but he never expressed his personal beliefs. I can't say if this helped me or hurt me in the long run. But I do know that when I got older and my relationship with my parents became less of a concern, if I had established a greater relationship with God I may have gotten myself into less trouble, and I may have not made as many mistakes that I would later regret. In this sense, I wish my parents would have instilled their beliefs in me when I was younger. It may have taken me longer to decide if those were the beliefs that I would chose to live my life by, but I would at least have something to fall back on during a time where peer pressure has its greatest influence.



I think parents who try to let their children decide their own beliefs are usually making a big mistake. Their are some children who innately know what is right and wrong, and they are stubborn enough to stick to their beliefs. But the average child needs to be protected against many things that are taught by our society. A parent needs to counteract these things with good morals, and an explanation of why those morals are important. If a parent fails to this, who knows where a kid will learn his sense of morality.



I think you should have asked your son what he meant by his question. To me, the question meant "If you didn't believe in God, would you still love me if the world as it is was here somehow, but there was no God to watch you? (Or do you love me because God says you must?)" I think you answered the question "Could you love me if there was no God?"
Permanent Link

10/22/2005 - Answering your Child

Posted by Anonymous
The clear answer to that question is "Yes".



Being an Atheist I see all the dancing around you did rather than simply tell your child you would love them is really off base.



My opinion.



As far as whether you should teach your child your personal beliefs. Certainly you should. They need a frame of reference to put their lives in. When they get older they can change this frame of reference if it becomes necessary. If you are a Christian and you believe this is what makes you who you are, teach your children about it. Let them know how you feel. To do otherwise makes no sense.



Please respect my right to raise my kids free of the influence of superstition. :-)
Permanent Link

10/22/2005 - Answering Yes

Posted by
I do support your right to raise your children according to your beliefs. I'm not amongst those who think that people who believe differently than I need to be made to teach their children MY moral code. I also appreciate your taking the time to post.



As to whether I should have simply said "yes" rather than addressing the theological aspect of the question: that's a bit harder for me. I guess the question from your perspective would have been what to answer if your child had asked, "Would you still love me if there was a God?" "Yes" would be a fine answer, but if you feel that belief in God would be harmful to their future growth would you have used that question as an opportunity to discuss why God is not possible? Maybe not. Maybe it was just a need for an affirmation of love, but maybe it is a philisophical query about the nature of love in the universe. I guess in the end how you answer depends on what question you thought they were asking, and since the answer is one that presumes something in which you do not believe it also depends on how precise you want to be. I still think you might be right that Yes was the right answer, but I'm not sure.

Edited by soulcraft on 10/22/2005 at 11:58 PM
Permanent Link

10/18/2006 - I Agree with your answer

Posted by oldmoe
It makes perfect sense

oldmoe
Permanent Link

Share and enjoy
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • DZone
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
Entry 1 of 10
Last Page | Next Page

Kevin Barnes

Soul Craft is a place for my thought, arguments, stories, poems and epiphanies about what it means to be an I, a We and an Us.

Links

My Wall