Steps taken towards the ability to have something that is lasting seems to cause grief when taken the wrong way. One step causes the next step to follow and then another one after the next. Sometimes we walk without thinking it through, but just focused on the point we try to get to. In a society for democracy it is said to be understood by those who partake in it. Other societies are based on other factors that democratic people may find misplaced or directed. If it is communism, why is it communism? If it is socialism, why is it socialism? If it is a nation for the people and for the people, who decides? What about competition considering gas prices rising? How does it affect those in a democracy? Looking from an open standpoint not much to a nation of people who are not in competition, maybe like in Latin America where many of the people expect the conditions, they stand out. So if your not in a competitive environment, what differentiates fair or unfair? In that question, what differentiates it in other social economies or governments? Each government is ran by leaders who make decisions out of cultural, rarely societal beliefs. This is based out of the history, distinction, and blood that brings these actions or causes in a society. Sacrifice is something not seen in this day and age, more return. In a modern, new age government, it is what can bring the most return economically rather than socially. This is where nations differ and conflict begins. Leaders are not representing a whole people nationally in a government, no matter where it may be, so it is left to the arbiters. What all this is leading to is futher steps in battle than grace. In an open election anywhere in the world it is disgraceful.